Home

The Law Report - relevant, cost effective resources so you keep up to date with just the things you need to know.

Register for the
FREE weekly email alert

Register for the Weekly Newsletter to receive a FREE weekly email alert.

Register for the
FREE 30 day trial

To give you even more information subscribers to The Law Report can access:

  • Advanced archive searching
  • Headnotes of notable cases
  • Summaries of New Zealand legislation
Find out more about The Law Report.
Subscribe NOW

News

Trump's national security adviser quits (14 February 2017) (USA)

bbc.co.uk

Donald Trump's national security adviser, Michael Flynn, has resigned over his contacts with...

Read More

'Justice by algorithm’ fear over web pilot (13 February 2017) (UK)

Law Society Gazette

Plans to allow people charged with criminal offences to opt for an online resolution are to go...

Read More

Panama Papers law firm founders arrested (14 February 2017) (AUS)

australasianlawyer.com.au

Two founding partners of the law firm at the centre of the Panama Papers leak, have been arrested...

Read More

Aussie banks, not NZ customers, should foot $550m bill for change says RBNZ (14 February 2017) (NZ)

stuff.co.nz

The Australian-owned banks, not Kiwi consumers, should fork out between $550 million and $870m to...

Read More

Enabling faster and better urban development (14 February 2017) (NZ)

beehive.govt.nz

Public consultation has opened on proposed legislation to fast track the redevelopment and...

Read More

FMA draws attention to new accounting standards (14 February 2017) (NZ)

Minter Ellison Rudd Watts

The FMA has today released a reminder that the effective dates of the new accounting standards...

Read More

Privacy Commissioner's report to the Minister of Justice under Section 26 of the Privacy Act (3 February 2017) (NZ)

Office of the Privacy Commissioner

Privacy Commissioner John Edwards has recommended to the Government, as part of its plans to...

Read More

Lawyers and judge call for Family Court and property law reforms (11 February 2017) (NZ)

stuff.co.nz

A judge is calling for better resources for the Family Court, after a couple's fight over...

Read More

Third-party litigation funding keeps on growing (13 February 2017) (UK)

nzlawyer.co.nz

The UK saw an increase of more than 25% in litigation funding commitments last year, a law firm...

Read More

Law firm’s straight-talking ad deemed indecent by ads board (13 February 2017) (NZ)

australasianlawyer.com.au

A law firm may have gone overboard with its “straight talk” mantra. One of Arnet...

Read More

First $1m+ fine for breach of consumer laws (10 February 2017) (NZ)

Minter Ellison Rudd Watts

Reckitt Benckiser (New Zealand) Limited (RBNZ) was fined $1.08 million in the Auckland District...

Read More

Bending time for the benefit of all (10 February 2017) (AUS)

lawyersweekly.com.au

The example of one young trailblazer shows how the benefits of a flexible work policy can reach...

Read More

Firm politics to make or break junior lawyers (9 February 2017) (AUS)

lawyersweekly.com.au

One principal has said the “political savvy” increasingly required in law firms is...

Read More

Historical homosexual convictions eligible to be wiped (9 February 2017) (NZ)

beehive.govt.nz

The Government will introduce a new scheme to address historical convictions for homosexual...

Read More

Next steps for Telco Review announced (10 February 2017) (NZ)

beehive.govt.nz

Communications Minister Simon Bridges today confirmed details of the Government’s new...

Read More

FMA takes criminal action against a financial adviser (10 February 2017) (NZ)

Minter Ellison Rudd Watts

The FMA has laid 6 criminal charges against Anthony Norman Wilson of Hunter Wells, an individual...

Read More

New trade mark scam operating in New Zealand (10 February 2017) (NZ)

A J Park

We have become aware of what appears to be a new trade mark scam operating in New Zealand....

Read More

Firm targets evolving client needs with new platform (9 February 2017) (AUS)

lawyersweekly.com.au

One firm has announced the launch of a new program, which it says is set to “reimagine the...

Read More

FMA Issues 12 Formal Warnings over AML/CFT Breaches (8 February 2017) (NZ)

Minter Ellison Rudd Watts

oday the FMA announced that it has issued 12 formal warnings to various companies and individuals...

Read More

Reserve Bank publishes final outsourcing policy decisions (7 February 2017) (NZ)

Minter Ellison Rudd Watts

The Reserve Bank’s outsourcing policy (BS11) regulates the use of external service...

Read More
Click here to access all news in the archive

Articles

Privacy Commissioner recommends six key changes to the Privacy Act (14 February 2017) (NZ)

Bell Gully

The penalty for a serious or repeated breach of the Privacy Act could be increased to a fine of...

Read More

M&A Series: Warranty limitations (14 February 2017) (NZ)

DLA Piper

In M&A transactions, sellers routinely seek to limit their exposure under warranties and...

Read More

IRD consults on GST treatment of management fees and outsourced services (14 February 2017) (NZ)

DLA Piper

"Questions we've been asked" (QWBA) are statements issued by the Office of the Chief...

Read More

Australia’s draft intellectual property legislation proposes changes to the Australian IP system (13 February 2017) (AUS)

Baldwins

Late last year the Intellectual Property Office of Australia released an Exposure Draft of the...

Read More

What is happening in Europe – the political ramifications of Brexit on the European Patent System (13 February 2017) (EU)

Baldwins

In the July 2014 Patent Prose article we considered plans to set up a unitary European patent and...

Read More

Implementing the National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity (10 February 2017) (NZ)

Simpson Grierson

The National Policy Statement on Urban evelopment Capacity 2016 (NPS-UDC) came into force on 1...

Read More

Brexit's impact on energy sector remains uncertain despite recent parliamentary and legal developments (9 February 2017) (EU)

DLA Piper

Recent legal and parliamentary developments have yet to resolve the significant uncertainty...

Read More

Advertising - Get it right (10 February 2017) (NZ)

DLA Piper

February has barely hit and we are already starting to see some action from the Commerce...

Read More

FMA releases final conduct guide (8 February 2017) (NZ)

Chapman Tripp

​A Guide to the FMA's view of Conduct (the Guide) identifies a set of customer-focused...

Read More

2016 advertising crackers (3 February 2017) (NZ)

Simpson Grierson

As 2017 begins, we take a moment to appreciate some of the crackers from 2016 that made us laugh...

Read More

NZ government publishes results of copyright and designs in the creative sector study (2 February 2017) (NZ)

Baldwins

The New Zealand Government has recently published its Copyright and the Creative Sector report,...

Read More

2017 Litigation Forecast (31 January 2017) (NZ)

Minter Ellison Rudd Watts

Welcome to MinterEllisonRuddWatts’ litigation forecast, delivered by our Dispute Resolution...

Read More

IOSCO weighs in on the growth of robo-advice (1 February 2017) (NZ)

DLA Piper

At the end of December 2016, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO)...

Read More

The Blockchain revolution (31 January 2017) (NZ)

DLA Piper

Blockchain is on the verge of revolutionizing how we interact in the digital world. It has far...

Read More

Global Data Privacy Snapshot 2017: How does your organisation compare? (26 January 2017) (NZ)

DLA Piper

Personal information is an increasingly valuable business asset. Technology provides the...

Read More

Importance of on-going compliance: changes for KiwiSaver annual statement information (19 December 2016) (NZ)

Chapman Tripp

A Cabinet paper outlining recent policy decisions which will change the information KiwiSaver...

Read More

New Zealand public sector on top - but fight against corruption real (NZ)

Bell Gully

​​​​​​​​This week, New Zealand regained its top position in the annual...

Read More

The demands and resources arising from shared office spaces - Auckland University Report (September 2016) (NZ)

www.researchgate.net

The prevalence of flexible and shared office spaces is increasing significantly, yet the...

Read More

Battle of the Masters: MasterCard defeated by the World Masters Games (10 January 2017) (NZ)

Baldwins

More than anything else the case of World Masters Games 2017 Limited v Mastercard International...

Read More

Brexit: Statute required to trigger Article 50, says Supreme Court (26 January 2017) (EU)

Bell Gully

On 24 January 2017 the UK Supreme Court delivered its decision in the “Brexit case”,...

Read More
Click here to access all articles in the archive

Cases

Criminal Sentencing

Chisnall v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections

Appeal against a High Court (“HC”) decision which granted the Dept of Correction’s request for an interim detention order pending the outcome of the substantive applications for a public protection order under the Public Safety (Public Protection Orders) Act 2014 or, in the alternative, an extended supervision order under the Parole Act 2002 (“PA”) - the appellant had spent most of his adult life in prison following convictions for sex offending and was due for release on in April 2016, having served a full 11-year sentence for two counts of sexual violation by rape – reports indicated continuing threatening and aggressive behaviour and sexual fixations - whether the order was unjustified - whether the HC was prevented from making a public protection order because the appellant suffered from intellectual disabilities.

Read More

Liquor Licensing

J & C Vaudrey Ltd v Canterbury Medical Officer of Health

Appeal against a High Court (“HC”) decision which found that the District Licensing Committee (“DLC”) or Alcohol Regulatory and Licensing Authority (“ARLA”) were required to describe a single alcohol area that complied with the mandatory requirements set out in s113(5) Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 (“SSAA”) – on approving the first appellant’s off-license applications on the papers, the Canterbury District Licensing Committee (“CDLC”) had varied the proposed single alcohol area – with regard to the second appellant, the CDLC had imposed conditions - whether the direction in s113(1) SSAA (decision-maker must have regard to s112(1) when describing an alcohol area) merely gave guidance on the implementation of s113(5) SSAA (authority or committee must describe an alcohol area within the premises) - whether the DLC/ARLA could describe a single area materially different from that sought by the applicant – whether conditions could be imposed under s117 SSAA (other discretionary conditions) that had the effect of altering the single area imposed under s112 SSAA (compulsory conditions relating to display and promotion of alcohol in single area in supermarkets and grocery stores) or restricting the configuration or arrangement of that area – whether the ARLA or the HC were able to refer a matter on appeal back to the decision-maker below.

Read More

Family Protection, Wills

Mahon v Mahon

Appeal against a High Court (“HC”) decision which dismissed the appellants’ claims that their deceased grandmother had failed to make adequate provision for them in her final will under s3 Family Protection Act 1955 (“FPA”) (persons entitled to claim) and that their grandmother’s last three wills were the result of undue influence exercised over the deceased by her surviving son – the appellants were the children of M’s other son who had predeceased her – the brothers had owned and managed a business together – whether the HC had erred by wrongly requiring that the appellants establish “improper” influence – whether the HC failed to have proper regard to all of the circumstances when assessing whether undue influence was established and had been wrong to dismiss the FPA claim.

Read More

Building, Fair Trading, Leaky Building, Tort

Andrews Property Services Ltd v Body Corporate 160361

Appeal against a High Court (“HC”) decision concerning the defective remediation of an apartment complex that suffered from weathertightness issues – the HC found that the appellant had failed to ensure a survey was carried out, it had failed to affix the new cladding in accordance with design specifications and that producer statements it had provided to the fifth respondent had breached the Fair Trading Act 1986 (“FTA”) – the Fleetwood Apartments, a central Auckland apartment building constructed in 1994, suffered weathertightness issues and a defective remediation undertaken in 2005 – the appellant was the contractor for the fourth respondent (which had provided architectural and engineering consultation) for the design of the remediation – their agreement provided that each would undertake a survey of the building – whether the architectural services company was required to undertake a survey - whether it had had modified that obligation - whether the appellant had failed to comply with a contractual obligation concerning the method of affixing the cladding sheets - whether the appellant had breached an implied duty to install the sheets in a proper workmanlike manner - whether the appellant’s producer statement provided to the fifth respondent was misleading and breached the FTA.

Read More

Property

Escrow Holdings Forty-One Ltd v District Court at Auckland

Appeal against a Court of Appeal (“CA”) decision which held that a deed of covenant and encumbrance entitled Lot 2 to utilise parking spaces on Lot 4 – the appellants submitted that the CA had failed to give effect to the plain language of the deed of covenant which was negative and did not confer positive rights of access or parking on Lot 4 to Lot 2 - whether the CA had failed to give effect to the plain language of the deed of covenant.

Read More

Construction, Leaky Building, Limitation

Lee v Whangarei District Council

Appeal against a Court of Appeal decision which held that the appellant’s claim against the Whangarei District Council was out of time pursuant to s37(1) Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 (“WHRSA”) (application of Limitation Act 2010 to applications for assessor’s report) – the appellant’s house, constructed in 2007 and 2008, was leaky - in August 2008 the appellant applied for an assessor’s report under s32(1) WHRSA - in March 2010 the appellant initiated an adjudication in the Weathertight Homes Tribunal which was terminated on the basis of s60(5) WHRSA (right to apply for adjudication of claims - owner of a dwellinghouse may not apply to have an eligible claim adjudicated if it was the subject of an arbitration that had already commenced) as appellant had also commenced arbitration proceedings under the Construction Contracts Act 2002 - whether, pursuant to s37(1) WHRSA, the application for an assessor’s report stopped the clock for limitation purposes.

Read More

Criminal Evidence, Criminal Sentencing

Preston v R

Appeal against a High Court conviction for murder on the grounds that a miscarriage of justice had arisen because errors were made in admitting certain material as evidence, prosecuting counsel’s conduct and deficiencies in the summing-up - appeal against sentence of life imprisonment with a minimum period of imprisonment of 19 years, on the ground that the minimum period of imprisonment was too high – the appellant was convicted of murdering his former partner – they had been involved in a bitter custody dispute – DNA evidence on the murder weapon was identified as the appellants – whether the appellant’s text message should have been introduced as propensity evidence – whether the victim’s statements to third parties should have been excluded as hearsay under the Evidence Act 2006 (“EA”) – whether statements made by the appellant to a pastor should have been excluded under s58 EA (privilege for communications with ministers of religion) – whether there had been prosecutorial misconduct due to the nature of emotive statements or speculation – whether the minimum period of imprisonment imposed under s104 Sentencing Act 2002 (imposition of minimum period of imprisonment of 17 years or more) was manifestly excessive.

Read More

Family

Bartrum v Bartrum

Appeal against a Family Court (“FC”) decision which; found that $290,000 contributed by the appellant to the purchase of the first family home was her separate property; set aside the contracting-out agreement under s21J Property Relationships Act 1976 (“PRA”) (Court may set agreement aside if would cause serious injustice); and directed that the balance of the real property be divided in accordance with the provisions of the PRA – cross-appeal by the respondent concerning validity of the agreement regarding adequacy of legal advice. The parties were married in 2007 and separated in 2013 – they had executed a contracting out agreement in 2006 - whether the FC had failed to properly assess the effect of the contracting out agreement - whether the respondent had intentionally designated property for commercial reasons (thereby preventing him from claiming that it was relationship property) – whether the appellant had made the majority of the financial contributions to property and if yes, whether the contracting out agreement was unjust - whether the contracting out agreement was valid having regard to the legal advice given to the respondent.

Read More

Charities, Trusts

Re Burnett Mount Cook Station Charitable Trust

Application for directions under s66 Trustee Act 1956 (“TA”) (right of trustee to apply to court for directions) for the sale of the property owned by the Trust – the Public Trustee had been appointed as the Trustees – the settlor had established a charitable trust known as the Burnett Mount Cook Station Charitable Trust to preserve and protect the natural and historic heritage and values of the property and its surrounds – the Trustees had purported to enter into a sale agreement for part of the trust property after their appointment as Trustees had expired - the Trust deed conferred on the Trustees the power to dispose of property – whether the sale should be approved under s66 TA.

Read More

Contract, Fair Trading, Tort

Cygnet Farms Ltd v ANZ Bank New Zealand Ltd

Claim for damages in the relation to the defendant bank’s alleged negligence, negligent misstatement, pre-contractual misrepresentation, breach of contract and breach of the Fair Trading Act 1986 when promoting interest rate swaps – the plaintiff had borrowed funds to purchase a dairy farm – the defendant had promoted interest rate swaps as a financial product – the defendant had agreed to structure a loan of nearly $4 million in the form of two interest rate swaps – the defendant had not explained to the plaintiff the potential downsides to swaps compared with fixed rate loans - the swaps were disadvantageous for the plaintiff when the 2008 Global Financial Crisis occurred as it could not take advantage of a precipitous fall in floating rates – whether the defendant made negligent misstatements in making its representations because it gave advice calling for special skill and competence on which the plaintiff relied and it failed to exercise reasonable care to ensure its representations were accurate – whether the defendant made pre-contractual misrepresentations, under s6 Contractual Remedies Act 1979 (“CRA”) (damages for misrepresentation) that induced the plaintiff to enter into the swaps and suffer loss – whether the defendant had a partly oral contract, or alternatively a collateral contract, regarding the level of service it would provide to the plaintiff which it breached causing the plaintiff loss – whether the defendant’s representations were misleading and deceptive in terms of s9 FTA - whether the tort of “pure” negligence could impose liability on the defendant arising from its relationship with the plaintiff.

Read More

Criminal Sentencing

R v Taylor

Sentencing for manslaughter, by failing to provide the necessaries of life, thereby causing death. This was an offence pursuant to s150A Crimes Act 1961 (“CA”)(misconduct of human remains), s151 CA (duty to provide necessaries and protect from injury), s160(2)(b) CA (culpable homicide - by an omission without lawful excuse to perform or observe any legal duty), s171 CA (manslaughter) and s177 CA (punishment of manslaughter). The defendant was also convicted under s228(1)(b) CA (dishonestly taking or using document) after she withdrew superannuation funds deposited into her uncle and mother’s bank accounts after their deaths – two other offenders were sentenced under s195A CA (ill-treatment or neglect of child or vulnerable adult) - the deceased was 76 years old who had died of dehydration and malnutrition.

Read More

Company, Equity, Insolvency, Trusts

Intext Coatings Ltd (in liquidation) v Deo

Application by the liquidators of the plaintiff company to recover drawings by the first and second defendants from the company totalling $490,528, and for a declaration that the company was entitled to trace payments used for mortgage repayments on a residential property owned by the first defendant into an equitable proprietary interest in the property – the liquidators claimed those payments had been made in breach of the first defendant’s fiduciary duties as a director - the plaintiff company was put into liquidation - the first and second defendants were wife and husband and were the directors and/or shareholders of the company – whether the company could recover drawings made for personal expenditure - whether payments made in repayment of a mortgage could be traced in equity as the “proceeds” of those payments, or whether such repayments simply discharged a debt owed to the mortgagee – if the mortgage repayments could not be traced into the property, whether a constructive trust could be founded on the alternative basis that the company had an equitable lien over the property because the mortgage repayments had improved the property – whether subrogation was an appropriate remedy.

Read More

Property, Trusts

Carey-Venable v Carey

Summary judgment application for an order of sale under s339 Property Law Act 2007 (“PLA”) (Court may order division of property) and the payment of $900,000 being the amount the defendant promised to pay under a deed as part reduction of his debt to her for an advance to buy his interest in the property and the return of chattels – the parties were siblings who purchased a residential property in 2008 as tenants in common in equal shares – the plaintiff had paid the full purchase price – the defendant was to repay the plaintiff $900,000 from the sale of another property and repay the balance by expending labour and materials on maintenance – defendant claimed the plaintiff held a second property on trust for him – whether the plaintiff held the second property on an express or resulting trust for the defendant and his sons – whether an order for sale of the first property should be given under s339 PLA.

Read More

Civil Procedure, Costs

DK Kelsey Ltd v Matakana 2008 Ltd

Application by defendant for security for costs - the plaintiff was suing the defendant for breach of contract and misrepresentation following the purchase of a café and art gallery – the plaintiff’s sole director resided in South Africa and the plaintiff had not filed an annual return, making it vulnerable to being struck off – the shareholders/director had refused to give a guarantee of the plaintiff’s costs obligations - the defendants relied on the ground in r5.45(1)(b) High Court Rules 2016 , namely that that there was reason to believe that the plaintiff would be unable to pay the costs of the defendant if the plaintiff was unsuccessful - the plaintiff said that the defendants caused its impecuniosity – at the time that the parties entered into the agreement, they had each placed funds into their solicitors’ trust accounts pending valuation of stock following a mutual stock take which was never undertaken – the plaintiff wished to use this money for its security - whether the defendant had caused the plaintiff’s impecuniosity - whether the discretion to order security should be exercised - whether funds held in a trust account for a stock take which had not taken place could be used for security for costs.

Read More

Judicial Review, Law Practitioners

Orlov v New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal

Appeal against the dismissal of a judicial review application – the applicant was a legal practitioner who was ordered to be struck off the roll of barristers and solicitors by the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal after making remarks about a High Court (HC) Judge – the HC had upheld the conviction but allowed the appeal against penalty – it also had dismissed a judicial review application - the applicant alleged breaches of natural justice including late amendment of the charges, late filing of evidence, submission of evidence amounting to “ambush” and provision of “doctored” evidence in that an opinion from a QC that was favourable to him was not included among the evidence in a file that was submitted – the applicant also submitted that he should have been permitted to call evidence about derogatory statements made by other practitioners about judges, even though he calculated this would have resulted in the hearing lasting six months – whether the breach of natural justice in the process for amending the charges had prejudiced the applicant - whether there had been no case to answer because the respondent had only relied on court decisions and had no other evidence - whether there had been unfairness in the submission of the file of evidence without the QC’s opinion and whether the HC had failed to address all of the applicant’s grounds.

Read More

Costs

Quake Outcasts v Minister for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery

Application by respondents for costs following their successful defence of a judicial review proceeding - proceeding related to decisions on offers the Crown would make to buy uninsured, earthquake affected land in the Red Zone in Christchurch - the applicants were refused leave to appeal a High Court decision directly to the Supreme Court but the majority’s decision made comments indicating the appeal had merit. The applicants then received an increased offer from the Crown following reconsideration in the light of the various court decisions up to that point - this was accepted, but the applicants pursued further judicial review proceedings to gain an increased offer - the Crown sought 3B costs plus disbursements and certification for two counsel – the applicants argued that the case had been in the public interest as it tested extraordinary powers under emergency legislation and the legitimacy of compensation offers for other Red Zone owners - whether the case was of sufficient complexity for 3B costs - whether the applicants’ acceptance of the revised offer from the Crown meant they knew the proceedings were unlikely to be successful - whether the public interest exception to costs applied.

Read More

Criminal Sentencing

R v Campbell

Sentencing following a guilty plea in the District Court to one charge of indecent assault – the defendant was subject to the “three strikes regime” under s86D(2) Sentencing Act 2002 (Stage-3 offences other than murder: offender sentenced to maximum term of imprisonment) - while the defendant was serving a sentence of imprisonment, he grabbed the buttock of a female Corrections officer - the Corrections officer was not injured but as a result suffered stress and was off work - the defendant said that he grabbed the officer as a bit of a joke and he thought his actions would be taken that way - he submitted that serving the full sentence without parole would be manifestly unjust, given the low level of the offending and his remorse, early guilty plea and age (25 years old) - the Crown acknowledged that the Court might regard a finding of manifest injustice to be an appropriate outcome - whether it would be manifestly unjust that the sentence be served without parole.

Read More

Criminal Sentencing

R v Winders

Sentence for the murder following trial by jury. Winders (W) was found to have shot Tin (T) at point-blank range – the murder occurred a week after a minor accident which W considered that T (a traffic controller at road works) had caused – the police had considered W to be a strong suspect – they followed W while he was driving at speed and arrested him, but W was not later charged with a driving offence – while in custody W made a statement that the prosecution later relied on at trial – whether a 17 year non-parole period should be imposed - whether the minimum period of imprisonment should be reduced because of breaches by the police of W’s rights under NZBORA.

Read More

Law Practitioners

RF v CN

Review of complaint that the fees charged by a practitioner, particularly those that related to work done in cancelling the retainer were excessive and that the practitioner had failed to advise the complainant of a request from the opposing counsel for more information - the complainant said that the failure to pass on this request resulted in the litigation not being settled at an early stage - whether the practitioner breached her professional obligations by failing to inform the complainant of the request for further information - whether the practitioner was entitled to charge for work undertaken to cancel the retainer - whether the fees charged were fair and reasonable - whether the practitioner breached s161 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (Stay of proceedings for recovery of costs) by continuing recovery proceedings for costs awarded by the District Court before the complaint had been finally disposed of - whether an invoice rendered by the practitioner after delivery of the Standards Committee decision should be considered on review.

Read More

Civil Procedure, Costs

Richard Zhao Lawyers Ltd v Chen

Appeal against the decision of a Court of Appeal (CA) Judge to decline an application for dispensation with security for costs under r35 Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005 (CA Rules) - the appellant applied to the CA Registrar for dispensation – before the Registrar made a decision, a conference call was held with the presiding judge on a separate procedural issue - the Judge raised the issue of the application for dispensation from security for costs and after hearing from both counsel, dismissed the application – the appellant’s argued that the judge did not have jurisdiction to determine the application for dispensation during the conference call and complained of having received insufficient notice that security for costs would be argued - whether the power under 61A(1) Judicature Act 1908 to make incidental orders and directions gave jurisdiction to the Judge to determine an application for dispensation from security for costs in the first instance.

Read More
Click here to access all cases in the archive

Legislation

Parliament

Statutes Amendment Act 2016 No 104

Read More

Health and Safety, Property

Hurunui/Kaikoura Earthquakes Recovery Act 2016 No 102

Read More

Health and Safety

Fire and Emergency New Zealand Bill 148-2 (2016)

Read More

Parliament

Electoral Amendment Bill 176-2 (2016)

Read More

Indigenous Rights, Maori, Property

Iwi and Hapu of Te Rohe o Te Wairoa Claims Settlement Bill 236-1 (2016)

Read More

Health, Health and Safety

Food Safety Law Reform Bill 135-2 (2016)

Read More

Commercial, Contract

Contract and Commercial Law Bill 134-2 (2016)

Read More
Click here to access all legislation in the archive

© Law Leader Ltd 2010
Web development in partnership with Jaijaz